<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valedictorian designation outdated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shseyeofthestorm.com/opinion/valedictorian-designation-outdated-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shseyeofthestorm.com/opinion/valedictorian-designation-outdated-2/</link>
	<description>Student Newspaper of Summit High School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:45:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Scheid</title>
		<link>http://www.shseyeofthestorm.com/opinion/valedictorian-designation-outdated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Scheid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shseyeofthestorm.com/?p=256#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I agree with your statement in Paragraphs 9 and 10 that not everyone can be a valedictorian, however, aren&#039;t you undermining the basic &quot;anti-labeling&quot; thesis of your argument by doing just that by using the term &quot;conservative&quot;? Was it necessary to classify people who would better be described as hopeless optimists with a political label?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your statement in Paragraphs 9 and 10 that not everyone can be a valedictorian, however, aren&#8217;t you undermining the basic &#8220;anti-labeling&#8221; thesis of your argument by doing just that by using the term &#8220;conservative&#8221;? Was it necessary to classify people who would better be described as hopeless optimists with a political label?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
